When I wrote The Future of Online Learning in 1998, I took into account three major units of factors. He explains how the rise of zombie apocalypse fiction indicators our intense want for an ending; how the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street kind two sides of the same submit-narrative coin; how company investing sooner or later has been replaced by futile efforts to recreation the stock market in actual time; why social networks make individuals anxious and electronic mail can feel like an assault.
With the rise of Christianity, the notions of time and its linear direction begin to be applied to the mental sphere, and, as experimental science takes form, these notions step by step start to blaze a trail in the research of nature, giving delivery to the concepts of pure history, of oriented and irreversible adjustments in nature and society.
Ogburn is probably most famous for his theory of ‘tradition lag’ which, just like futurist Alvin Toffler’s concept of ‘future shock’, describes how society and individual values typically fail to keep up with the pace of social change driven by know-how, due to this fact not foreseeing its penalties in time to change then and so permitting the know-how itself to govern our social constructions with little moderation.
As the artwork and science of manipulation come to be better understood, the dictators of the future will likely study to mix these techniques with the non-cease distractions which, in the West, at the moment are threatening to drown in a sea of irrelevance the rational propaganda essential to the maintenance of individual liberty and the survival of democratic establishments.
Even if such breakthroughs don’t arrive in time, and built-in circuit fabrication expertise does ultimately hit a physical restrict, it seems very doubtless that the focus would simply shift from building sooner individual processors to instead linking massive numbers of inexpensive, commoditized processors together in parallel architectures.